where price, supply, demand, and cap meet — the measure of what tokens carry through the cybergraph. every coin locked, every card minted encodes a claim about value
value in cyber is emergent. no authority declares what a token or particle is worth. value arises from the intersection of four forces: supply (how many units exist), demand (how many neurons want them), price (the ratio at which exchange occurs), and cap (the aggregate claim on future utility). these four measures constrain each other — none is meaningful alone
the cybergraph makes value observable. every cyberlink is a staked assertion, every card is a priced epistemic claim, every unit of karma is an earned reputation metric. the graph reveals value through structure: particles with high focus are valuable because many neurons committed real tokens to link them. focus IS the protocol's measure of value at the particle level
value flows through two channels. the economic channel moves coins — staking, fees, transfers, and bonding curves denominate value in fungible units. the epistemic channel moves knowledge — cyberlinks, cards, and scores denominate value in claims about what matters. the two channels interact: epistemic value (high-karma links) attracts economic value (staked coins), and economic value (conviction) amplifies epistemic value (focus weight)
cap aggregates value across the network. the market capitalization of a token — price multiplied by supply — represents the collective assessment of all future utility that token provides. cap is a summary statistic, a compression of millions of individual valuations into a single number
value theory in cyber rejects subjective-objective dichotomies. value is computational: it emerges from the tri-kernel processing cyberlinks weighted by conviction. the kernel computes focus, gravity, and density — all measures of value at different scales. the protocol does not define value; it computes it
discover all concepts