F₂ tower field arithmetic for binary proving. kuro is to F₂ what nebu is to Goldilocks.
the tower
F₂ → F₂² → F₂⁴ → F₂⁸ → F₂¹⁶ → F₂³² → F₂⁶⁴ → F₂¹²⁸
1b 2b 4b 8b 16b 32b 64b 128b
each extension: $F_{2^{2k}} = F_{2^k}[x] / (x^2 + x + \alpha_k)$
at the top: F₂¹²⁸ = 128 F₂ elements packed in one u128 machine word. one XOR = 128 additions. one AND = 128 multiplications. SIMD-native.
why kuro exists
bitwise operations in Goldilocks (F_p) cost ~32 constraints each — bit decomposition is expensive in a prime field. in F₂, they cost 1 constraint. the 32× gap is the algebraic distance between F_p and F₂.
two workloads dominate the binary regime:
- quantized AI inference: BitNet 1-bit models. matrix-vector multiply = XOR + popcount
- tri-kernel SpMV: quantized axon weights for φ* iteration
kuro provides the field arithmetic. the binary PCS (zheng) provides the commitment. nox Bt instantiation (nox<F₂>) provides the execution. together: binary workloads at native cost.
dependency graph
nebu (Goldilocks) kuro (F₂) ← this repo
↓ ↓
hemera (hash, trust anchor)
↓
nox (VM)
↓
zheng (proofs, binary PCS uses kuro)
↓
bbg (state, binary traces fold into Goldilocks accumulator)
discover all concepts