discussing only for dunbar scale (150 ppl)
<7 => simple threshold multisig
<150 =>
- problems
- voting appathy
- majority and minority tyranny
- limited attention
- not a profesional
- lack of incentives
- vote buying
- collusions
- free riding
- tools
- coin weighting
- quadratic
- conviction
- time locks
- dynamic thresholds
- decay
quadrant of governance
| no personal incentive | personal incentive | |
|---|---|---|
| discrete | democracy | prediction markets |
| continuous | gauge voting | Shapley value |
decision types
discrite => d/futarchy => dutarchy
contioniuos
- yuma consensus => Shapley value => https://github.com/cyberia-to/cybernet
- quadratic measurements
- add more fairness
future: communications => coordination graphs => auto inference
research is ongoing
fairness in cyber: token-weighting ties influence to verifiable stake, not identity. no single neuron can monopolize focus — the collective focus theorem guarantees convergence to a distribution shaped by the full topology, not by any individual position